These grants have played a large role in triggering changes in the early education space, which has been a growing priority for the Obama administration. And while the competitions themselves tend to receive attention from policymakers and the media, the actual implementation process, which is critical to the success of the program, is too often overlooked. Last year, for New America’s Early Education Initiative, journalist Paul Nyhan conducted case studies of winners of four competitive grant programs that have benefited the early education field-- Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC), the Social Innovation Fund (SIF), Investing in Innovation (i3), and Promise Neighborhoods-- to discover what happens after the awards are doled out.
We’ve compiled these case studies into After Winning, Then What? An Inside Look at Four Winners of Federal Early Education Grant Competitions, a policy brief providing an overview of the four grant programs and offering an inside look at the implementation process. This brief reveals what kind of progress is possible -- and what limitations exist -- when policies are advanced through small competitive grants.
Nyhan examines how:
- Washington State is using its $60 million RTT-ELC grant to improve early learning programs;
- Detroit has applied SIF funding to evaluate the effectiveness of its early childhood programs;
- The University of Minnesota is scaling up the renowned Chicago Parent-Child Centers model with i3 funds; and
- San Antonio is improving school-readiness with comprehensive and community-based supports as part of its Promise Neighborhood project.
While these initiatives have managed to be sustained over the past several years, their future is looking relatively bleak. Most of the President’s competitive grant programs have been dealt drastically reduced funding in his second term, and the recently passed fiscal year 2015 spending bill completely eliminated funding for Race to the Top, which also impacts RTT-ELC. And with the next Congress under GOP-control, it’s unlikely that these other programs will continue either.
Even though these programs might not receive substantial funding in the next Congress, there are still important lessons to be learned. Nyhan reveals how these programs have helped accelerate reform in early education in several states and communities as well as why flexibility and adaptability are essential to successful implementation. He also explains how grantees have overcome obstacles related to ambitious timelines and program evaluation.
Read the full brief, available here, to find out more about these competitive grant programs and how implementation is faring for grantees.