Technology and Emerging Humanitarian Frontiers
June 1-2, 2015
Press Release
July 2, 2015
The American Red Cross, World Humanitarian Summit, and the Institute for Global and International Studies at George Washington University convened a two day conference on June 1-2, 2015, Emerging Humanitarian Frontiers, to discuss the state of humanitarian response in three key areas: the protection of marginalized populations, the use of cutting-edge technology and engagement with local communities. The goal of the event was to discuss recommendations in the lead-up to the World Humanitarian Summit, which will be held in May 2016.
The Open Technology Institute chaired the first working
group on cutting-edge technologies in humanitarian response. The working group
considered the major themes of the day’s plenary session led by Hansjoerg
Strohmeyer, Chief of OCHA’s Policy Development and Studies Branch; Dr. Nigel
Fisher, Senior Advisor for Humanitarian Policy and Complex Crises at the
KonTerra Group; and, Steve Cornish, Doctors with Borders, Canada.
The discussion was framed by Hansjoerg Strohmeyer’s
principles of effectiveness, as described in the plenary:
1. Connected: reinforce existing local capacity that is active
and organized.
2. Context-driven: tailored-response to handle important
differences between natural disasters, conflict and chronic disasters.
3. Complimentary: leave infrastructure and capacity behind,
rather than building temporary parallel structures.
4.Nimble: respond to changing circumstances and recognize the
areas where the international community has a comparative strength and where
local responders have a comparative strength.
As the first of four working groups on cutting-edge
technology, the first group focused on identifying both opportunities and
challenges posed by the deployment of new technology solutions in humanitarian
response, and specifically focused how local voices and marginalized populations are impacted by those various interventions.
The working group was motivated, in part, by calls to better
understand and evaluate the key factors and criteria as when and how new
technology implementation approaches will be meaningful and successful (IFRC
2013). It was also motivated by calls for critical inquiry into the
motivations, context, externalities and beneficiaries of technology
interventions in humanitarian response, particularly as it reshapes roles,
priorities, resource distribution, private partnerships and privacy (Sandvik et al.
2014).
During the working group, participants divided into three
groups to reflect on their experiences. Two groups identified challenges
and opportunities posed by specific tech interventions on the strength of local
voices and protection of marginalized populations. The third group identified
specific successes and failures when technology was used in a new way during a
response, and then formulated that specific example into a general principle. Participants then gathered to reflect on common lessons, observations
and principles. This discussion centered around how different implementation
choices, both compared to other choices and to the status quo, would impact
marginalized populations, local capacities and overall effectiveness.
—
Kristin B. Sandvik, Maria G. Jumbert, Karlsrud, John, and
Mareile Kaufmann. "Humanitarian Technology: A Critical Research
Agenda." International Review of the Red Cross (2014): 1-24.
IFRC. "Innovation, Evaluation and Diffusion of Humanitarian Technology." In World Disasters Report 2013.