Welcome to New America, redesigned for what’s next.

A special message from New America’s CEO and President on our new look.

Read the Note

Background

In an era dominated by digital communication and instant information sharing, the concepts of misinformation and disinformation have become increasingly significant. Both terms refer to the spread of false or misleading information, but they differ fundamentally in intent and impact. Understanding these differences is crucial for comprehending the broader challenges they pose to society.

Misinformation is defined as false or inaccurate information that is shared without the intent to deceive.1 It typically spreads when individuals or organizations disseminate information they believe to be true but is actually incorrect or misleading. This happens for various reasons, such as misunderstandings, lack of verification, or reliance on untrusted sources. For instance, during breaking news events, misinformation often spreads rapidly as people share unverified reports in an attempt to make sense of evolving situations. Although misinformation is usually shared in good faith, it can still cause significant harm by perpetuating falsehoods and misleading others.

Disinformation, in contrast, refers to the deliberate creation and dissemination of false information with the intent to deceive or manipulate.2 Unlike misinformation, disinformation is a calculated strategy often employed by individuals, organizations, or even governments to achieve specific objectives. These objectives may include influencing public opinion, manipulating political outcomes, damaging reputations, or creating social unrest. Disinformation campaigns are typically sophisticated and well-organized, exploiting the vulnerabilities of digital platforms and human psychology to maximize their reach and impact. The intentional nature of disinformation makes it particularly dangerous, as it can undermine trust in institutions, polarize societies, and destabilize democratic processes.

The study of misinformation and disinformation has become increasingly important as these phenomena have a profound impact on various aspects of society. The rise of social media and other digital platforms has dramatically amplified the speed and reach of information dissemination, including the spread of false information. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, highlighted the dangers of misinformation, as the spread of false health information undermined public health efforts and contributed to widespread confusion and harm. Disinformation campaigns, in particular, have been used as tools to create confusion, foster distrust, and deepen societal polarization, weakening the social fabric and the foundations of democratic governance.3 In an era where trust in traditional institutions and media is already under strain, the impact of disinformation can be particularly damaging, leading to increased cynicism and disengagement among the public.

“In an era where trust in traditional institutions and media is already under strain, the impact of disinformation can be particularly damaging, leading to increased cynicism and disengagement among the public.”

The complexity of detecting and responding to misinformation and disinformation further underscores the importance of studying these phenomena. The methods used to spread false information are becoming more sophisticated, employing technologies such as bots, deepfakes, and algorithmic amplification to reach wider audiences and evade detection. This technological evolution makes it more challenging to identify and counteract misinformation and disinformation effectively. In addition, the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation raises important ethical and legal questions.4 Society must navigate the delicate balance between protecting free speech and preventing harm, determining the responsibilities of platforms and governments in regulating content, and upholding the public’s right to accurate information.

The distinction between misinformation and disinformation is not merely academic; it has practical implications for how society addresses these challenges. The interdisciplinary nature of misinformation and disinformation studies highlights their broad relevance. These phenomena intersect with various fields, including communication, political science, psychology, sociology, and computer science. Each discipline offers unique insights and methodologies that contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of these complex issues.

Citations
  1. Darrin Baines and Robert JR Elliott. “Defining Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation: An Urgent Need for Clarity during the COVID-19 Infodemic,” Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham (2020), source.
  2. Baines and Elliott, “Defining Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation,” source.
  3. Pablo Moral, “The Challenge of Disinformation for National Security,” in Security and Defence: Ethical and Legal Challenges in the Face of Current Conflicts, ed. Juan Cayón Peña (New York: Springer International Publishing, 2022), 103–119.
  4. Rafael Cacciolari Dalessandro, José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, and D. Grant Campbell, “Fake News as an Emergent Subject Domain: Conceptual and Ethical Perspectives for the Development of a Critical Knowledge Organisation,” in The Human Position in an Artificial World: Creativity, Ethics and AI in Knowledge Organization, ed. David Haynes and Judi Vernau (Baden-Baden, Germany: Ergon Verlag, 2019), 208–217.

Table of Contents

Close