Conclusion

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to local early childhood governance, and early learning programs can thrive in a variety of governance structures. Many decisions about governance options will evolve naturally out of the process of advocating for a new program, building public support, and getting political buy-in. The pragmatic choice will often follow existing capacity and funding streams. Even when the die is cast, there are ways to redistribute power and authority to organizations and people who might not be central to decision-making, but whose voices and energy help sustain a healthy, functional system. In this way, early childhood governance plays a critical role in providing a high-quality experience for families and children who use services, but in a variety of shapes and sizes.