Laura Bornfreund
Senior Fellow, Early & Elementary Education
The kindergarten many of us picture faded in recent memory, not in the distant past.
On June 1, Gryphon House published Rediscovering Kindergarten: Embracing Play and Joy in Learning. My book draws on more than 50 kindergarten classroom visits and more than a decade of preK-3rd grade research and conversations. I wrote it to call on educators, decision-makers, and families to transform kindergarten into a year where play-based, joyful learning and challenging academic content go hand in hand. We know that kindergartners and early grade students learn best through play, relationships, and interactions. They need well-rounded learning opportunities that connect literacy, math, science, and social studies. They need activities and engaging discussions that help them learn about the world and cultures around them. For children to become strong readers and lifelong learners, they need teachers who build their background knowledge and vocabulary and create whole-child learning opportunities. The kindergartens that most children experience these days, however, do not meet these needs. In this blog series, I delve into some key ideas from my book and what I learned about kindergarten. This second post focuses on the history of kindergarten.
The history of kindergarten isn’t about cute classrooms and finger painting. The real story of kindergarten is far more interesting and useful for some of the education debates we’re having right now. Here are five things worth knowing.
The word kindergarten comes from German and literally means “a child’s garden,” a place where children and their learning grow. When Friedrich Froebel opened the first one in Germany in 1837, he didn’t design it around worksheets or sight words. He built it around play, design, discovery, and nature. Froebel believed everything is interrelated, so learning should be interdisciplinary rather than chopped into isolated subjects. That foundational idea that play is how young children learn is not a soft, modern luxury. It’s the original blueprint.
Here’s a fact that may surprise you: American kindergartens began as programs for children aged three to six. In the early decades, we recognized the benefits of having three-year-olds in an early learning setting. Somewhere over the last few decades, we lost that thread. As we argue today about preschool access, universal pre-K, and what “school readiness” means, it’s worth remembering that kindergarten pioneers already understood something we keep rediscovering: the early years matter enormously, and starting intentional learning early benefits children and families.
Kindergarten history is not all gardens and songs either. As public education expanded, children of color, girls, and children with disabilities had limited access or none at all. In much of the South, Black children weren’t offered kindergarten for decades. New Orleans served white children beginning in 1876, but didn’t offer Black children a kindergarten option until the 1940s. And much of the progress that did happen for Black children came from within the Black community itself, through leaders like Anna Evans Murray, who fought to fund kindergartens in Washington, DC, and to train Black kindergarten teachers when segregated training schools shut them out. When we talk about equity in early education today, we’re continuing a fight that’s well over a century old.
If today’s tension between play and rigor feels exhausting, know that it’s not a new argument. Back in 1994, early childhood expert Lilian Katz described the kindergarten debate as a pendulum “raging back and forth.” Even Froebel’s own followers split into camps: conservatives who wanted to preserve his exact methods, progressives like John Dewey who wanted to innovate, and moderates in between. What strikes me is something Dewey understood: Froebel himself would likely have welcomed a new and better understanding of how children learn, rather than insisting on rigid adherence to his original activities. The lesson isn’t to pick a side of the pendulum. It’s about continuing to question and understand: how do children learn best, and how do we best teach them?
The kindergarten many of us picture faded in recent memory, not in the distant past. Leading up to and after No Child Left Behind in 2002, the pressure of testing and accountability pushed more rigid reading and math down into kindergarten, and play areas, blocks, science, art, and music got crowded out to make room. “No time for play,” some administrators said. But here’s why I find the history hopeful rather than discouraging: a shift made so recently can be unmade. Play, oy, and deep learning weren’t displaced by some immovable force. These essential elements of learning were displaced by choices. And we can choose to do something different.
School and district leaders are the ones who decide whether classrooms have room for blocks and discovery, or whether they don’t. State and local education leaders are either the architects or the demolitionists of the conditions where joyful learning can happen. And some schools and school districts have already made, or are beginning to make, better choices for kindergarten. This is what I’ll focus on in my next post.