Key Conclusions: Projecting Automation Risk and Job Growth in Elkhart-Goshen

1) Nearly one in two jobs in the Elkhart-Goshen region are at high risk of automation. In the Elkhart-Goshen metropolitan statistical area (MSA), 47 percent of all jobs, employing a total of 51,110 people, are at high risk of automation. Another 29,760 people are employed in medium-risk occupations (27 percent) and 28,240 people are in low-risk occupations (26 percent).

2) Automation risk in Elkhart-Goshen is significantly higher than the national average. Compared to the rest of the country, the Elkhart-Goshen region is far more susceptible to automation. In the United States as a whole, only 35 percent of workers fall under the high-risk category. In fact, according to a recent Brookings Institution report, Elkhart-Goshen has the third highest automation risk for all U.S. metro areas.¹

BLS 10-year job growth projections corroborate a vision for a bearish future for those in the highest risk category. High-risk jobs are predicted to decline in raw totals by 2026, shedding 429 positions, meaning they will far underperform on national job growth projections. Much of this is driven by a projected 4,000-job decline in “Team Assemblers,” the most common occupation in the region. Meanwhile, medium-risk positions are set to increase by 9.52 percent, while the lowest-risk positions are predicted to increase by nearly 8 percent.

3) High automation risk stems from the region’s manufacturing base and heavy concentration of assembly jobs. In the Elkhart-Goshen area, widely thought of as the RV capital of the world, employment is heavily associated with the manufacturing of RVs. According to BLS data, the job of “Team Assemblers” employed 21,538 people in 2016—more than the next nine top jobs combined. In total, around 20 percent of the entire regional workforce is occupied in this assembly work. Production jobs like these are some of the highest risk of all occupations to automation. Even in the near term, the BLS projects that the occupation will contract 9 percent statewide by 2026.

In total, around 20 percent of the entire regional workforce is occupied in this assembly work.

4) Historically, Elkhart-Goshen has bucked some of the national automation trends. Already, the region has one of the highest rates of entry for robots in the entire country and the highest density of robots of any metropolitan area.² Despite the presence of these robots, assembly line employment in RV manufacturing remains robust. The regional RV industry has remained relatively resistant to labor displacement for several reasons. Automation typically hits high-volume production facilities first, whereas RVs are produced slowly, often with high degrees of customization, and so are more similar to residential construction than to many modern automobile production lines. To date, RV manufacturers, unlike the automobile industry, have refrained from investing major capital to automate processes during economic downturns, allowing human labor to fluctuate along with the economy.

However, the future looks less certain. As Rachel E. Blakeman, community research institute director at Purdue University Fort Wayne, says, “RVs have been one of the most labor-intensive vehicles because it’s not automated in the same way as, say, assembly of pickup trucks here in Fort Wayne is. But those days may not last forever and are likely not to.”³

“RVs have been one of the most labor-intensive vehicles because it’s not automated in the same way as, say, assembly of pickup trucks here in Fort Wayne is. But those days may not last forever and are likely not to.”

Workers with Less Education

Among workers in the region, and in the nation as a whole, the least-educated workers are at greatest risk of automation. This is especially true of workers in jobs that require a high school degree or less, who comprise 54 percent of workers in high-risk occupations. Only 13 percent of high-risk jobs require a bachelor’s degree or higher. Those numbers are flipped for low-risk jobs: 45 percent of low-risk occupations typically require at least a bachelor’s degree, while just 24 percent require a high school degree or less.

Workers Who Make Less Money

The jobs at low risk of automation pay approximately twice as much as those at low and medium risk of automation, on average. High- and medium-risk occupations earn a mean salary of $31,923 and $37,664, while low-risk occupations earn an average of $62,635. These local trends reflect similar national trends.

Nationally, 68 percent of Team Assemblers have a high school education or less.

The Eklhart region stands out, however, in the number of high-risk, well-paying jobs that require a high school degree or less. With a mean salary of $42,780, jobs on the assembly line pay significantly higher wages than jobs with similar educational attainment spreads, such as fast food workers, who earn only $19,180 per year. Nationally, 68 percent of Team Assemblers have a high school education or less. Thus, future contractions of this occupation suggest that without additional training, education, or new high-quality opportunities, these workers are likely to see significant declines in income and job quality.

Men

Contrary to the United States overall, where our data suggest that women are more likely than men to be employed in occupations at high risk of automation, male workers in the Elkhart-Goshen region represent 56 percent of those in the highest risk category. However, much of this disparity stems from the disproportionate share of labor force, of which men comprise 60 percent. For instance, women hold only 41.1 percent of positions in the top 10 most common jobs, including only 36 percent of Team Assembler positions.

In the next several years, BLS job growth projections suggest that the gender breakdown of new jobs reflects the current picture, despite heavy declines in certain occupations. Using current gender balances in occupations, combined with predictions of future job growth, men are set to receive around 60 percent of new jobs by 2026.

High-Paying Jobs are Projected to Grow at the Fastest Rates

According to BLS job projection data, high-paying jobs in the region are expected to grow at the fastest rates. Common high-paying jobs such as mechanical engineers, financial managers, and physicians all are projected to grow at rates greater than 10 percent, compared to lower-paying jobs like inspectors, secretaries, and bookkeepers, which all have negative projected job growth. The balance of job growth raises questions about the talent pipeline and the extent to which the current workforce will have the education, skills, and training to connect to the jobs of the future.

In the Medium Term, Top Growing Jobs Will Require a Variety of Skills

There is no one type of job that will dominate the Elkhart-Goshen labor force in the future, and some of the jobs projected to grow in the medium term may not stick around for the long term. Of the top five growth jobs in Elkhart-Goshen, only one, registered nurses, is at a low risk of automation. Fast food workers are projected to have the greatest number of job openings over the next few years, even though this job also has a high risk of automation in the longer term. Thus, the challenge is to fill these positions while ensuring that those workers have the skills and education to move on in the long term if automation ultimately displaces those jobs.

Several positions with the greatest projected percentage growth are health and hospitality positions, which typically are associated with women and involve automation-resilient job tasks such as caregiving and empathy. Personal care aides, registered nurses, and medical assistants are expected to grow in stature in the region; based on current national estimates, each of those jobs is held by a woman more than 70 percent of the time.

Top 30 Growth Jobs by Magnitude

Occupations at Highest and Least Risk

The Largest Occupations Most at Risk

Of the 50 occupations that employ the most people in the Elkhart-Goshen metro area (totaling well over half of all workers), the following 20 occupations are the most at risk of automation.

The Largest Occupations Least at Risk

Of the 50 occupations that employ the most people in the Elkhart-Goshen metro area, the following 13 occupations have a low risk of automation.

How Does Elkhart-Goshen Differ from the U.S. Average?

Overall, the risk of automation facing workers in the Elkhart-Goshen region is far higher than the rate of risk across the U.S. workforce overall.

Ways the Elkhart-Goshen Area Workforce Is More Resilient to Automation Than the Nation Overall

• To date, the RV sector has displayed notable resiliency to automation, which has protected workers in otherwise high-risk occupations, such as Team Assembler and Welder.
• Medium-risk jobs have the highest growth rate of risk categories over the next few years, possibly reflecting the current strength of the U.S. economy. So long as the nationwide economy continues to perform well and demand for RVs remains strong, there is reduced incentive to automate.

Ways the Elkhart-Goshen Area Workforce Is More Vulnerable to Automation Than the Nation Overall

• The Elkhart-Goshen regional economy relies heavily on a single sector: manufacturing. Around half of all nonfarm workers in Elkhart-Goshen are employed in the manufacturing sector, whereas only 8.5 percent of all U.S. workers are employed in manufacturing. If employers do automate, many people in the region will be affected simultaneously. This will cause large worker outflows to underdeveloped secondary industries and strain social and personal safety nets.
• Elkhart-Goshen lags behind the state of Indiana and the nation in educational attainment. The amount of people with no high school diploma in Elkhart County (19.5 percent) far exceeds the comparative percent for the state of Indiana as a whole (11.5 percent). The amount of people with at least a bachelor’s degree in Elkhart-Goshen (18.3 percent) is far below the Indiana (24.6 percent) and national averages (30.3 percent). When employers eventually do automate certain processes, those who have less education will struggle to fill the higher-caliber jobs that take their place.

While Elkhart and Goshen have managed to buck certain trends and displacement from automation, the region has experienced the ups and downs too frequently and too recently to assume that massive displacement will not reoccur. Perhaps more urgently, the interim employment many residents sought during the Great Recession—frontline roles in fast food or retail—are incredibly vulnerable and becoming less available, meaning that future disruption could be even more harmful to families. In order to grow the resilience of the workforce and ensure that more workers are able to smoothly transition to roles requiring new skills, to new industries, or to entrepreneurial self-employment, leaders in the region should consider:

1. Automation-Informed Decision-Making: Training career and technical educators, career and high school counselors, faith leaders, and customer-facing staff at community-based organizations to better understand automation vulnerability, the importance of lifelong learning, and the concrete opportunities for continuing education and training.
2. Future-Oriented Work-based Learning: Continued investment in registered apprenticeship and work-based learning experiences that communicate to participants and employers the need for building fundamental—sometimes called “soft” or “employability”—skills. Local leaders in the space include Horizon Education Alliance.
3. A Reality Check On Wages: Analyzing the cost-benefit of low paid, low skill roles that are difficult to fill or retain versus paying more competitive wages for roles that involve work-based learning to develop employees to move within an organization or take on bundled roles. Considering trends in younger worker mobility and migration in an area that has difficulty retaining and growing population, you are increasingly unlikely to find enough workforce to fill underpaid roles with mobility ceilings.
4. Entrepreneurial Training and Infrastructure For All: Entrepreneurial education and support should be designed and made available for all, including—and perhaps, especially—for those outside of residents emerging from university settings, tech incubators, or personal wealth. Residents who are selling crafts on Facebook Marketplace, individual farmers, and others who are not always considered entrepreneurs are ripe for development.
5. A Focus on English-Language Learners: Goshen especially has had a major shift in demographics, with more than 50 percent of students enrolled in Goshen Community Schools identifying as Hispanic/Latinx. This presents an opportunity to promote the community as more vibrant and inclusive, a major asset for recruiting new businesses to the region. It is also a call to action for local employers to adjust recruiting, pay attention to inclusion efforts, and ensure that multilingual learning for all students is a priority to produce a talent pipeline ready to compete in a changing environment.
6. Experimentation With Investment in Sobriety Pathways For Workers: Just as there is return on investment to employers for investing in release time for training or paying for tuition and training (versus expecting employees to pay and be reimbursed), there is emerging evidence on a decent return on investing in employee sobriety. The region is struggling, like much of the Midwest, with rampant opioid addiction. A frequently voiced frustration of employers looking to hire is not the complexity of hiring in an environment of full employment, but rather finding a sober candidate among those trying to re-enter the workforce. Following the lead of another Indiana employer who offers addiction treatment as part of onboarding could cut recruitment costs, increase retention, and contribute to community stability. We will not fulfill the needs of a future workforce by stranding large populations of recovering Hoosiers.
7. A Shift in Mindset: Manufacturing is not going away, even as technology alters it dramatically. Even as Elkhart-Goshen has been somewhat unique in opting in and out of certain waves of automation in select sectors, automation will continue to impact opportunities for earning. The inability to find enough talent for traditional manufacturing roles is driving some automation, but we are not seeing workers flock to the lowest paid roles to stem that tide. Nor are we likely to. Meanwhile, the efficiency and safety gained by redeploying repetitive tasks is simply too great. To hope for it to sort itself out by attrition is circular. To design for a more mobile, adaptable worker who can do advanced work in manufacturing and move fluidly across roles and employers is strategic.

What Do We Mean by Automation and Risk of Automation?

In our analysis, the rankings of automation risk describe the technical feasibility that an occupation can be computerized or automated with state-of-the-art technology available today. The data on automation potential come from Burning Glass Technologies, and are derived largely from the well-known 2013 study “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to ” by Oxford University researchers Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne.⁴ To calculate the automation risk of a given occupation, Frey and Osborne evaluated the ability of computers to perform its underlying associated tasks:

• “High risk” occupations are the top quartile of risk, with at least 85 percent risk of automation for a given occupation.
• “Medium risk” occupations are in the second quartile of risk, between 50 percent and 85 percent risk of automation for a given occupation.
• “Low risk” occupations are in the bottom two quartiles, with less than 50 percent risk.

A few key caveats are important to consider when interpreting the data.

First, the rankings are not a probability that a given job actually will be automated. Even if a job or task technically could be done by a computer, this does not necessarily mean that it will. A range of legal, logistical, business, financial, political, and social factors could lower the real rate at which businesses and employers adopt technology and automate functions. Moreover, predictions about technology have a relatively high degree of uncertainty.

Second, jobs that have some tasks that technically can be automated will not necessarily be displaced. Instead, the nature of many jobs will change—in some cases, dramatically—but they jobs themselves will not be eliminated. (A January 2017 McKinsey report estimates that half of job tasks could be automated, but only 5 percent of jobs will be outright eliminated.)⁵ This change implies that workers in at-risk occupations will need to continuously upskill to keep pace with the changing requirements of their occupation.

Finally, even though technology and automation will displace some jobs and change others, new jobs also will be created and other jobs will expand. Our analysis does not capture the impact of projected job creation.

Notes on the Data

• Data on automation potential come from Burning Glass Technologies, derived largely from the 2013 study “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne.
• Occupational and wage data for the Elkhart-Goshen metropolitan area are from the BLS and cover the period from January 1 to December 31, 2017. The geographic area covers the entirety of Elkhart County.
• Data on national averages of women in occupations come from the BLS.
• Data on education levels of employed individuals come from the American Community Survey five-year estimates (2011–15).