<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://newamericadotorg-static.s3.amazonaws.com/static/css/newamericadotorg.min.css"></link>

States Consider Increasing Children's Access to Full-Day Kindergarten

As state legislatures around the country continue their sessions, we’re keeping an eye on states considering legislation related to full-day kindergarten. First, a reminder of the current state of play when it comes to full-day kindergarten around the country. Currently,only 11 states and DCrequire school districts to offer a full-day of kindergarten instruction. (Depending on the state, “full-day” kindergarten can range from 4-7 hours per day. See our brief“Making the Hours Count”for more on this inconsistency.) However, more districts are offering full-day kindergarten options today than in the past. In fact, since 1977 the percentage of kindergartners enrolled in full-day rather than half-day programshas increasedfrom 28 percent of all kindergartners to 77 percent in 2013 (see chart below). I won’t go into the research on the benefits of full-day kindergarten in this post, but check out CJ Libassi’spostfor a good overview of the research and details about a first-of-its-kind randomized trial of full-day kindergarten that shows sizable learning advantages at the end of the year compared to half-day programs.

Screen Shot 2016-03-02 at 9.45.15 AM

So, what action are we seeing at the state level when it comes to funding full-day kindergarten programs? First, let’s take a look at bills whose fates have already been decided. InVirginia, all but three localities already require schools to offer full-day kindergarten. Legislators considered a bill to requirealldistricts to offer full-day kindergarten as well as a bill that would have denied full accreditation to districts not offering full-day kindergarten. These bills, however, were bothkilled in committeeon party-line votes. A kindergarten bill inNew Hampshiremet the same fate. The New Hampshire bill would not have required districts to offer full-day kindergarten, but would have provided additional state funding to districts that chose to offer it. As the Education Commission of the States explained in a2013 report, the way a state chooses to fund its kindergarten programs can provide districts with strong incentives or disincentives to offer full-day kindergarten. The New Hampshire bill made it out of committee, but was thendefeatedon a party-line vote before the New Hampshire House.

A couple of other states are considering full-day legislation, but proponents aren’t optimistic about the chances of seeing a bill passed this session in these states. InColorado, legislators aredebating a billthat would provide about $243 million to fund free all-day kindergarten for all students in the state. Currently, all but 10 of Colorado’s 178 districts offer full-day kindergarten, but districts are forced to rely on local funds to pay for it and, in some cases, charge tuition to cover the cost. (13 states allow districts to charge parents tuition if they want their child to attend for a full day.) While the proposed bill passed the House Budget Committee, it’swidely expectedto die in the Appropriations Committee due to the state’s current budget restrictions.Utahlegislators proposed $10 million in additional state funding for optional full-day kindergarten, though districts would still be allowed to charge parents a fee for the extra hours. While the billpassed the House, it wassubsequently defeatedin the Senate.

There are a handful of states still actively considering full-day kindergarten legislation. Legislators inNew Jerseyare consideringa package of billsrelated to early education, includinga billthat would require all districts in the state to offer full-day kindergarten at an estimated cost of about $78 million. On a related note, the New Jersey Assembly recently passed a bill that would create a task force to study statewide full-day kindergarten, though Governor Christievetoedsimilar legislation last year. InNew Mexico,a billrequiring districts to provide full-day kindergarten was recently introduced and is currently sitting in committee. And, inNew York, a billhas been introducedthat would pay for full-day kindergarten across the state by using funds from the state lottery. The bill has yet to be acted upon, however.

States that are considering full-day kindergarten legislation would do well to examine the example recently set byOregon. As I wrotelast year, while the legislation passed by Oregon did not require districts to implement full-day kindergarten, it did provide $110 million a year to cover the costs. The results have been dramatic. In the 2014-15 school year, only 42 percent of kindergartners in the state attended full-day kindergarten. This school year, 99.7 percent of the state’s kindergartners areenrolledin full-day kindergarten. While many school officials initially worried that they lacked the necessary resources to handle full-day kindergarten, 740 out of 750 of the state’s schools eventually found a way. And of the ten schools that don’t offer full-day kindergarten, nine of them are charter schools or rural schools with only one or two kindergarten students.

Minnesotais another example of a state thatsuccessfully incentivizeddistricts to offer full-day kindergarten. While Minnesota does not require districts to offer full-day kindergarten, in 2013 Governor Dayton signed a bill that made full-day funding available to all districts that wished to participate. As a result, in the 2014-2015 school year,99.6 percentof Minnesota kindergarteners attended a full-day of school.

While seat time isn’t everything, a full-day of kindergartendoes allowfor more instructional time, a broader curriculum, and increased time for playful exploration. We’ll continue monitoring the status of full-day kindergarten legislation in these states and others as state legislative sessions continue throughout the remainder of the year."