References
ABT Associates. (2018). Supporting education strategies to improve skills, employment, and earnings. Bethesda, MD: author. https://www.abtassociates.com/sites/default/files/2018-05/090Career_Pathways_Brochure_March2018-single-page.pdf
Alamprese, J. A., Costelloe, S., Price, C., & Zeidenberg, M. (2017). Consortium for bioscience credentials (c3bc): Final report. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
American Association of Community Colleges. (2019, March). Fast facts. Washington DC: Author. https://www.aacc.nche.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/AACC2019FactSheet_rev.pdf
Bellville, J., Schoeph, K., Wilkinson, A., Leger, R., Jenner, E., Lass, K., & Coffman, K. (2017). West Virginia bridging the gap TAACCCT Round 3 final evaluation report. Indianapolis, IN: Thomas P. Miller & Associates.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.
Bragg, D., & Krismer, M. (2016). Using career pathways to guide students through programs of study. New Directions for Community Colleges, 176, 63–72.
Bragg, D., Cosgrove, J., Cosgrove, M., & Blume, G. (2018). Final evaluation of the ACED grant at Salt Lake Community College. Salt Lake City, UT: Salt Lake Community College and Chicago, IL: Bragg & Associates, Inc.
Bragg, D. (2019). Recommendations for future federal investments in community and technical education. Washington, DC: New America.
Caffey, D. (2016). Final external evaluation report TAACCCT Clovis Community College.
Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101–129.
Cohen, E., Michelson, K. S., Durham, C., & Eyster, L. (2017). TAACCCT characteristics: The Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training grant program brief 2. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/legacy/files/20170308-TAACCCT-Brief-2.pdf
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Davis, M. R., Hume, M., Carr, S. L., Dauphinee, T. L., & Heredia‐Griego, M. (2018). Round Four status report: Progress toward achieving systemic change. Albuquerque, NM: Cradle to Career Policy Institute, University of New Mexico.
Dauphinee, T., & Bishwakarma, R. (2018). SUN Path comparison study. Albuquerque, NM: Cradle to Career Policy Institute, University of New Mexico.
DerSimonian, R. and Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188.
Dockery, J., Bottomley, M., Murray, C., Tichnell, T., Stover, S., Schroeder, N., & Franco, S. (2018). TAACCCT final evaluation report Northwest State Community College of Ohio industrial automation manufacturing innovative strategic training achieving results (IAM iSTAR) initiative. Dayton, OH: Wright State University Applied Policy Research Institute.
Dunham, K., Hebbar, L., Khemini, D., Comeaux, A., Diaz, H., Folsom, L., & Kuang, S. (2016). ShaleNET Round 2 TAACCCT grant third-party evaluation final report. Oakland, CA: Social Policy Research Associates.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
Eyster, L., Cohen, E., Mikelson, K., & Durham, C. TAACCCT approaches: Targeted industries, and partnerships: The Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training grant program brief 3. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/taaccct-approaches-targeted-industries-and-partnerships
Feldman, J., Staklis, S., Hong, Y., & Elrahman, J. (2016). Evaluation report of the amplifying Montana's advanced manufacturing and innovation industry (AMAMII) project. Berkeley, CA: RTI International.
Foster, L. R., Staklis, S., Ott, N. R., & Moyer, R. (2018). Kansas technical re/training among industry-targeted networks (Kan-TRAIN). Portland, OR: RTI International.
Good, K., & Yeh-Ho, H. (2017). Orthopedics, Prosthetics, or Pediatrics (HOPE) careers consortium. Denver, CO: McREL International.
Harpole, S. H. (2017). Final evaluation golden triangle modern manufacturing project. SHH Consulting.
Haskins, R., & Margolis, G. (2014). Chapter 7: The Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Initiative. Show Me the Evidence: Obama's Fight for Rigor and Results in Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Haviland, S., Van Noy, M., Kuang, L., Vinton, J., & Pardalis, N. (2018). Evaluation of Clark State Community College's advanced manufacturing to compete in a global economy (AMCGE) training program. Piscataway, NJ: Education and Employment Research Center, Rutgers University.
Hendricks, A., Mitran, A., & Ferroggiaro, E. (2018). University of the District of Columbia final annual evaluation report. Fairfax, VA: ICF.
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560.
Hillman, N. W., & Orians, E. L. (2013). Community colleges and labor market conditions: How does enrollment demand change relative to local unemployment rates? Research in Higher Education, 54(7), 765–780.
Ho, H. (2016). Advanced manufacturing education (AME) alliance evaluation: Final evaluation report. Charleston, WV: McREL International.
Horwood, T.J., Usher, K.P., McKinney, M.T., & Passa, K. (2017). Maine is IT! Program evaluation final report. Fairfax, VA: ICF.
Horwood, T., Campbell, J., McKinney, M., & Bishop, M. M. (2018). Heroes for hire (H4H) program evaluation final report. Fairfax, VA: ICF.
Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468.
Jensen, J., Horohov, J., & Wright, C. (2016). Online2Workforce (O2W) TAACCCT Round II grant final evaluation report. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Evaluation Center.
Juniper, C. (2018). Greater Memphis alliance for competitive workforce (GMACW) TAACCCT Round 4 grant implementation evaluation final report. Austin, TX: Ray Marshall Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Kundin, D. M., & Dretzke, B. J. (2016). An evaluation of the manufacturing advancement and assessment center (MAAC) program, final report. St. Paul, MN: Center for applied research and educational improvement, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
Love, I. (2019). Navigating the Journey: Encouraging Student Progress through Enhanced Support Services in TAACCCT. Washington, DC: New America.
NC State Industry Expansion Solutions. (2017). Final evaluation report Round 3 TAACCCT grant: Mission critical operations. Raleigh, NC: NC State Industry Expansion Solutions.
New Growth Group. (2018). Building Illinois' bioeconomy (BIB) consortium final evaluation report. Cleveland, OH: New Growth Group.
Mikelson, K. S., Eyster, L., Durham, C., & Cohen, E. (2017, March ). TAACCCT goals, design, and evaluation: The Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training grant program brief 1. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/legacy/files/20170308-TAACCCT-Brief-1.pdf
Mokher, C., & Pearson, J. (2016). Evaluation of the Connecticut health and life sciences career initiative final report. Arlington, VA: CAN Analysis & Solutions.
Mora, X., Kemis, X., Callen, X., & Starobin, Y. (2016). 2016 I-AM annual evaluation report. Ames, IA: Research Institute for Studies in Education (RISE), Iowa State University.
The New Growth Group, & The Ohio Education Resource Center. (2018). The Ohio Skills Innovation Network (Ohio TechNet) final evaluation report. Cleveland, OH: The New Growth Group.
Palmer, I., & Nguyen, S. (2019). Connecting Adults to College with Credit for Prior Learning. Washington, DC: New America. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/lessons-adapting-future-work-prior-learning-assessment/
Patnaik, A., & Prince, H. (2016). Retraining the Gulf Coast through information technology pathways: Final impact evaluation report. Austin, TX: Ray Marshall Center.
Patnaik, A. (2018). Greater Memphis alliance for competitive workforce (GMACW) TAACCCT Round 4 grant impact evaluation final report. Austin, TX: Ray Marshall Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Person, A. E., Thomas, J., Bruch, J., Johann, A., & Maestas, N. (2016). Outcomes of competency-based education in community colleges: Summative findings from an evaluation of a TAACCCT grant. Oakland, CA: Mathematica Policy Research.
Pigott, T. (2012). Advanced in Meta-Analysis. New York: Springer.
Price, D., Sedlak, W., Roberts, B., & Childress, L. (2016). Making the future: The Wisconsin Strategy Final Evaluation Report. Indianapolis, IN: DVP-Praxis LTD.
Price, D., Childress, L., Sedlak, W., & Roach, R. (2017). Northeast resiliency consortium final evaluation report. Indianapolis, IN: DVP-PRAXIS LTD.
Price, D., Valentine, J., Sedlak, W., & Roberts, B. (2018). Advancing careers and training (ACT) for healthcare final evaluation report. Indianapolis, IN: DVP-PRAXIS LTD.
PTB & Associates. (2016). Evaluation of the Alabama/Florida Technical Employment Network TAACCCT Program. Bethesda, MD: Author.
Ruder, A. What works at scale: A framework for scaling up workforce development programs. Atlanta, GA: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. https://www.frbatlanta.org/community-
Scriven, M. (2001). Evaluation: future tense. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 301–307.
Shain, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2016). Project IMPACT final evaluation report. Omaha, NE: Shain Consulting and University of Nebraska at Ohama.
Styers, M., Haden, C., Cosby, A., & Peery, E. (2018). Southwest Virginia Community College: Final Report. Charleston, VA: Magnolia Consulting, LLC
Swan, B., Hahs-Vaughn, D., Fidanzi, A., Serpa, A., DeStefano, C., & Clark, M.H. (2017). Florida XCEL-IT: Information technology careers for rural areas final evaluation report. Orlando, FL: Program Evaluation and Education Research Group, University of Central Florida.
Tan, C., & Moore, C. (2017). Developing pathways for careers in health: The Los Angeles competencies to careers consortium. Sacramento: CA: Education Insights Center, Sacramento State University.
Tight, M. (2018). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of higher education research. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 1–20.
U.S. Department of Labor (2011). Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications for Trade Adjustment Act Community College and Career Training grants program. Washington, DC: Author. https://doleta.gov/grants/pdf/SGA-DFA-PY-10-03.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor (2012). Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications for Trade Adjustment Act Community College and Career Training grants program. Washington, DC: Author. https://doleta.gov/grants/pdf/taaccct_sga_dfa_py_11_08.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor (2013). Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications for Trade Adjustment Act Community College and Career Training grants program. Washington, DC: Author. https://doleta.gov/grants/pdf/taaccct_sga_dfa_py_12_10.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor (2014). Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications for Trade Adjustment Act Community College and Career Training grants program. Washington, DC: Author. https://doleta.gov/grants/pdf/SGA-DFA-PY-10-03.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Grant Program: Fiscal Years 2014–2016 report to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
WorkEd Consulting. (2017). North Dakota advanced manufacturing skills training initiative (NDAMSTI) final evaluation report. Burke, VA: WorkED Consulting.
WorkEd Consulting. (2018). Southern Regional Technical College TAACCCT: Healthcare Career Works! Third-party evaluation report. Burke, VA: Author.
Zandniapour, L., & Deterding, N. M. (2018). Lessons from the Social Innovation Fund: Supporting evaluation to assess program effectiveness and build a body of evidence of research evidence. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(1), 27–41.