Welcome to New America, redesigned for what’s next.

A special message from New America’s CEO and President on our new look.

Read the Note

Appendix D: Wrongful Detainee Interview Responses

Each interview included a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of PPD-30 by assigning a numerical value indicating the degree to which each participant agreed or disagreed with a variety of statements asked during the interview process. The numbers 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neither agree nor disagree; 4 = agree; and 5 = strongly agree.

Department of State Consular Affairs Range; Average
Consular Affairs was accessible to me. 2-4; 3.4
Information received during meetings and briefings was consistent and accurate. 1-4; 2.9
I understood the roles and responsibilities of Consular Affairs. 1-5; 3.3
All my emails and calls were answered promptly. 1-4; 2.9
Were any requests for meetings denied? All participants answered “No.”
Laws and policies were communicated clearly to me. 1-4; 2.3
I received a steady flow of information regarding my loved one’s case. 1-3; 2.1
Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs (SPEHA) Range; Average
The SPEHA was accessible to me. 1-4; 3.1
Information received during meetings and briefings was consistent and accurate. 1-3; 2.4
I understood the roles and responsibilities of the SPEHA. 2-5; 3.6
All my emails and calls were answered promptly. 1-4; 3
Were any requests for meetings denied? One participant answered “Yes.”
Laws and policies were communicated clearly to me. 1-4; 3
I received a steady flow of information regarding my loved one’s case. 2-3; 2.4
U.S. Government in General Range; Average
Candid assessments to recover your loved one was/has been shared with you by the U.S. government? 1-3; 1.4
Your return or the return of your loved one was/is a priority of the U.S. government? 2-5; 3.9
Appendix D: Wrongful Detainee Interview Responses

Table of Contents

Close