In Short

The Color Lines of Equal Pay

The Color lines of equal pay_image.jpeg

The wage gap wars are heating up in earnest, particularly as
Republican presidential hopefuls stake out the hardest right positions they can
find while Democrats stand ready to use the issue against them next year. But
as black women brace for a dizzying onslaught of debates sparked by white feminists
and male politicians (many if not most of whom leave black women out of the
discussion entirely), recent data reveal a gaping wage gap detail that makes it
much more complicated: black men.

If you’ve been watching closely, front-runners in a
fast-crowding 2016 GOP pack so far have been dismissing the wage gap as either too speculative a topic or
too expensive a proposition for businesses to matter as a political priority.
Lone presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, eager to win over the
woman vote, drew some fire from the right earlier this month when she cited
a World Economic Forum study showing “the United States is 65th out of 142
nations and other territories on equal pay.”

Yet among both candidates who affirm and those who deny the
centrality of equal pay as an issue, an important nuance is missing. Namely, if
current wage gap figures were exclusively focused on the earnings distance
between black men and women, the United States would find itself ranked in the Top
10 of advanced global economies. A recent study
by the American Association of University Women discovered a median annual pay
gap of only 9 percent between African American men and women. On average, black
men earn less than $38,000 year while black women earn a little over $33,000.

These numbers exist in stark contrast with pay gaps among
white men and women, where there is a vast 22 percent pay difference—an average
of $52,452 per year versus $41,010. And
while, on the surface, we see smaller gender pay gaps within the black
community, the overall economic picture they paint is really not all that rosy.

Black gender wage gaps aren’t necessarily a positive
indicator of a diminished wage gap between black men and women. What they
suggest is that systemic economic and personal financial hemorrhaging within
the broader black population continues.
Black women may have narrowed the gap, but it’s not like they’re making
what they should in comparison to white men and women. As we’ve noticed, the
events in Baltimore have snapped us back into that conversation and we need to
keep having it. Black women, compared to other populations, may be almost
completely caught up with their male peers by average income, but that gap is
narrowing at a time of alarming decline for black men. While a disappearing
black wage gap speaks to the rising educational and economic gains of black
women, it unfortunately illustrates persistent socio-economic challenges faced
by communities of color: poverty, black male unemployment, and mass incarceration.

In the 10 states with the largest populations of black
residents, the cents on the dollar earned by black women falls behind white men
by an average between 15-20 percent; the states where that gap is the narrowest
are the District of Columbia, Maryland and Delaware – yet, the gap is still
high. Interestingly enough, we can’t seem to find that breakdown for black men
by state. What we do know, however, is
that black men make 69
percent of what white men make on average each week in all professions.

An early May analysis
of the D.C./Maryland/Virginia metro area by local NPR affiliate WAMU-FM offers
some insight. It found jurisdictions like Washington, D.C. and Prince George’s
County, MD enjoying wage disparities of only 17 percent and 7 percent,
respectively. It just so happens these are majority black jurisdictions.

But these figures—while certainly cause for further study
and for optimism about future wage parity—are, in the short-term, more strongly
indicative of lagging economic trends in heavily black communities like D.C.
and Prince George’s County. For example, foreclosure rates
in majority-black Baltimore city and Prince George’s County are the first and
second highest such rates in the state of Maryland. It should be noted that
these locations are home to a thriving regional black middle-class built on
federal, state and local government employment and contracting. Still, they are
also some of the most impoverished areas in the region, with black unemployment
rates still double-digits in the city while Prince George’s County continues
tackling high foreclosure rates.

“[R]ace also figures into these earnings differences,” Ariane Hegewisch
of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research told WAMU. “African American
women traditionally are more likely to work full-time than other women and also
African American men, of course, are impacted by discrimination possibly and
really do not get the high-paying jobs.” In a peculiar and ugly twist, the
closing of that gap with black men may not mean actual progress as much as it
means black men are simply losing significant economic ground.

Such trends are seen elsewhere throughout the country where
there are large concentrations of black residents or where there are majority-black
populations. The Census Bureau American
Community Survey (ACS) is not tracking granular racial wage gap figures by city and county. But, a random sampling
of ACS data shows such gaps are
smaller in majority-black areas or urban centers than in places with massive
majority-white populations. In large
black urban cities like Detroit, Philadelphia, Richmond and Baltimore, the
general earnings gap between men and women is 1.45 percent, 9.47 percent, 10.2
percent and 13.5 percent, respectively.

But, in jurisdictions with huge majority-white and
relatively middle-class populations like Provo, UT, Loudoun County, VA,
Missoula, MT and Fargo, ND, the general wage gaps are much, much wider at 61
percent, 47 percent, 38 percent and 28 percent, respectively. Even within a major city like New York, gaps
vary by borough: 21.4 percent in majority-white Staten Island but ust 6.5
percent in Brooklyn, which is much more ethnically diverse. The more people of color a population in a
given location has, the more chance its wage gaps will diminish.

That’s not because communities of color have a magical
ability to erase wage gaps. It’s due to a combination of already sub-par wages
for black women compared to white men and white women, compounded to ongoing
economic doldrums for black men. These numbers matter because they reveal the
extent to which most mainstream earnings comparisons are largely conducted as
if men of color – especially black men – don’t exist. Many wage gap studies
(like this
one
) use “white, non-Hispanic male earnings” as the lead performance metric
for male earnings overall without even factoring in black or Latino men.

In the current environment where black unemployment,
underemployment, and poverty is still double the national average, the totality
of the African American community’s unique socio-economic circumstances must be
taken into account. Black male economic health can’t be left out of the
equation around the politics of the pay gap. White women are subject to
grueling pay gaps, but they also face these problems from the context of more
financially stable communities. The big question mark for black women, however,
is if they and their fathers, brothers and sons will continue to face an
unpredictable economic climate and whether these troubling trends will persist
over the next decade or generations to come.

More About the Authors

Charles Ellison