Mary Alice McCarthy
Senior Director, Center on Education & Labor
Lessons that policymakers can draw from the Great Recession to help guide our crisis response in the near-term
Last Thursday, the Labor Department reported that the number of people filing for unemployment insurance more than doubled in just one week, providing the first hard evidence that COVID-19 will be a disaster for American workers. This Thursday’s report is likely to be even more dramatic, and the workers most affected will be those with the lowest wages, fewest benefits, and least savings. In fact, many of them will not even show up in the DOL’s count because they will not qualify for unemployment insurance.
There are still many things we do not yet know about how this health crisis and ensuing recession will unfold, chief among them is how long it will all last. That said, there are lessons that policymakers can draw from the Great Recession to help guide our response in the near-term. The first is to focus policy responses on the right problems.
In 2008, the main priority was stabilizing our financial system. Today, the highest priority for policymakers at all levels of government should be on containing and suppressing the spread of the COVID-19 and preventing its re-emergence. No resources should be spared toward that effort.
The second order of business is dealing with the economic and social consequences of this coronavirus, including the threat of mass unemployment, recession, and social disintegration. Right now, it is important to be clear about what Congress should – and should not – do. Our response should build a foundation for rapid economic recovery – a recovery that puts American workers on a new and better footing and preserves our core institutions. Specifically, policymakers should:
Safeguarding the finances of American workers and their families should be paramount and the best way to do that is by ensuring they have income and other economic and social supports. The federal government should:
The U.S. can learn a lot from states and other countries about wage replacement and work-sharing schemes that incent employers to reduce working hours, while keeping people on the payroll and income flowing. For example, the UK is pledging to pay 80 percent of the wages of workers who employers cannot afford to pay, as a way of preventing both mass unemployment and a crash in consumer demand. Congress should explore and implement similar wage replacement or work-sharing strategies targeted to at-risk workers. It will help both the employers and the workers most directly affected by the crisis and build a foundation for economic recovery once the immediate crisis abates.
Education is at the center of many conversations around how to respond to COVID-19, due in large part to the need for immediate social distancing. Every family with children in school – from preschoolers to undergraduates – is feeling the impact of school closures and the lack of certainty about what’s next. But it is important to keep in mind that our current crisis is an acute health crisis. While necessary public health measures are disruptive to education, they are not a reason to change it all together. Our education system did not cause this crisis, but it can be leveraged to help families, communities, and government cope with it.
But we should be wary of claims that this crisis requires a whole-scale transformation of our education system toward online learning. While online higher education has grown significantly over the last two decades, its effects on students outcomes have been very uneven. According to one recent study, fully on-line coursework has accelerated gaps in college completion across different socioeconomic groups, with low-income and first-generation students falling behind their wealthier and more experienced peers. Part of the reason that students struggle with online education is that many lack basic technology, such as access to broadband and laptops. Those gaps track with differences in socioeconomic status – and will only get worse as vulnerable and cash-strapped students and their families lose jobs.
Today the education community needs to be focused on securing our schools – physically and financially – so that students can return to campuses next Fall. At the same time, advocates need to keep their eye on the long-term, which means pushing for policies that make it possible for students to afford education and for schools to provide high-quality instruction.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College Career Training (TAACCCT) grant program were large federal investments in our public workforce and community college systems that were critical to ensuring displaced workers got the counseling and education they needed to find new jobs. A recent meta-analysis of the TAACCCT program found that it did bolster the capacity of colleges to better serve the adults who flocked to their doors during the Great Recession, helping them earn new credentials, get new jobs and/or improve their earnings. Similar, large-scale investments will be necessary to deal with this crisis.
We are entering an unprecedented health and economic crisis and we need bold responses at every level of government. Those responses need to address the root causes of this crisis – the virus itself combined with the precarity of American workers, families, and small businesses.
This is not the end of America as we know it. But this crisis is sending us powerful messages about the need to take better care of our workers and their families and support responsible and empathetic leaders who will listen to experts, unite Americans around a common cause, and put the interests of the country ahead of their own.
Interested in staying up to date on education and workforce policy? Subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates on the latest from our experts.