In the past year, a conflict has erupted between technology companies, privacy advocates, and members of the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence communities over the right to use and distribute products that contain strong encryption technology. This debate between government actors seeking ways to preserve access to encrypted communications and a coalition of pro-encryption groups is reminiscent of an old battle that played out in the 1990s: a period that has come to be known as the “Crypto Wars.” This paper tells the story of the that debate and the lessons that are relevant to today.
Wednesday August 05, 2015
06:00 PM – 08:00 PM
[u'1899 L Street NW', u'Suite 400', u'Washington, DC 20036']
If the federal government pays for educational resources to be developed, should those resources belong in the public commons? Join New America for a conversation about how we should be thinking about the ownership of publicly funded educational materials.More about the event
Book: DRONES AND AERIAL OBSERVATION
NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT:A PRIMER
Consent of the Networked
The Worldwide Struggle For Internet Freedom
Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights
The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It
New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences
The Master Switch
The Rise and Fall of Information Empires
Beyond the Echo Chamber
How a Networked Progressive media Can Reshape American Politics
Speak Softly and Carry A Big Stick
How Local TV Broadcasters Exert Political Power
Even With the Manager’s Amendment
The privacy and security communities have long decried the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA, S. 754) as being bad on privacy and bad on security. As it turns out, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) - the civilian agency that quarterbacks the federal government’s cybersecurity and ...
OER Policy Coalition Calls on White House for Executive Action on Open Licensing of Federally Funded Educational Resources
Today, New America's Education Policy Program, along with a broad coalition of education, library, technology, public interest, and legal organizations, have called upon the White House to take administrative action to ensure federally funded educational materials are made available as Open Education Resources (OER) that are free to use, share, and improve.
Washington, DC - Today, New America’s Open Technology Institute published a report titled Broadband Truth-in-Labeling: Empowering Consumer Choice Through Consumer Disclosure. The report updates a proposal first made by OTI in 2009 for a nutrition-label-like standardized disclosure for broadband service packages that would enable consumers to more easily understand and ...
Empowering Consumer Choice Through Standardized Disclosure
In what hopefully will be a useful resource as the FCC and Consumer Advisory Committee work to develop a standardized disclosure format for the voluntary safe harbor established by the 2015 Open Internet Order, this document updates the original Broadband Truth-in- Labeling proposal first offered by OTI in 2009. The new format has been redesigned to reflect the FCC’s current rules on ISP transparency. This format also takes into consideration research regarding consumer decision- making, as well as OTI’s unique experience examining ISPs disclosures to collect the information used to inform OTI’s annual Cost of Connectivity reports.
OTI Updates Its 2009 “Broadband Truth-in-Labeling” Proposal
As a consumer in the United States, it is extraordinarily difficult to make informed decisions about Internet service providers (ISPs) and their offerings. Consumers trying to pick an Internet plan can’t always find the information they’d like to know about available service packages—basic information on speed and ...
We've seen evidence of this in Europe, which has had unbundling in place for years. In Paris you can buy a 95 megabit-per-second connection for around $25 — all without having to tack on a TV or phone package. To American eyes, these are refreshing figures. For about twice as ...
WASHINGTON, DC — Today six members of the Senate Commerce Committee, led by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), sent a letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler calling on the agency to proactively initiate a process to ensure that mobile carrier LTE-U technology will not disrupt consumer use of Wi-Fi on unlicensed spectrum ...
The President made clear from the beginning of this debate that addressing privacy concerns in legislation was essential, and threatened to veto the House Intelligence Committee’s bill, (H.R. 3523), twice. Now more than ever, he should stand firm to those priorities.
“More and more countries are enforcing their own requirements,” says Rebecca MacKinnon, director of the Ranking Digital Rights Project for New America, a Washington think tank. “Nations enforcing their own Internet restrictions present a tension between national interests and participation in a global marketplace.”
Today, a group of 68 security experts, tech companies, and civil society organizations sent a letter urging President Obama to threaten to veto the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA, S. 754). CISA raises many of the same concerns that were the basis of the Administration’s two veto threats over a previous information sharing bill titled CISPA.
The Open Technology Institute (OTI) at the New America Foundation recently released its report on bandwidth caps. "Artificial Scarcity: How Data Caps Harm Consumers and Innovation" is the latest warning about an issue with grave implications. The PDF is now available to download.
Last November, the Government Accounting Office (GAO ...
The Senate Appropriations Committee today approved a spending bill that jeopardizes net neutrality and the FCC’s hard-fought efforts to protect consumers. The bill includes a “rider” that would prohibit the FCC from fully implementing the recently-enacted Open Internet Order. The committee rejected an amendment by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) to remove the rider from the bill. The White House described a similar rider in a House bill as “highly problematic” and “ideological.”
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission circulated a proposal yesterday to approve AT&T’s proposed merger with DirecTV, contingent on several conditions designed to protect competition in the broadband and pay-TV markets. The conditions include requirements that AT&T be more transparent about how it exchanges traffic to and from its network (a process known as “interconnection”), offer a discounted broadband plan to qualifying low-income households, and not use data caps to disfavor online video competitors. The Open Technology Institute repeatedly urged the FCC to impose conditions on this transaction.
OTI Urges Senate to Amend Spending Bill
New America’s Open Technology Institute (OTI) today urged the Senate Appropriations Committee to remove language from a spending bill that would weaken the Federal Communications Commission’s recently-enacted net neutrality rules. The legislation, approved today by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services, includes a “rider” that would prevent the FCC from fully implementing the rules. The Senate Appropriations Committee plans to vote on the legislation tomorrow morning.
NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT:A PRIMER
Most people lack clear and secure rights to property—land, natural resources, and other goods and assets. That lack is in part a consequence of political and social breakdowns, and in part driven by informational deficits. Such property rights are crucial to human prosperity. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also known ...
Oti, Coalition of Human Rights and Technology Organizations Offer Recommendations on Export Controls for Surveillance Technology
Yesterday, OTI, along with Access, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Human Rights Watch, and independent researcher Collin Anderson, filed comments with the Commerce Department on a proposed rule that would govern export controls for surveillance technology.
Two weeks ago some of the biggest names in cryptography published a paper on the threats posed by intentionally weakened encryption. Titled “Keys Under Doormats: Mandating insecurity by requiring government access to all data and communications,” these experts strongly agreed that legislators must reject any proposal to turn back the clock to the encryption control proposals that were at the center of the 90s Crypto Wars. The report was widely covered in the media, (including a front page story in the New York Times) but, the press missed one of the most interesting aspects of the paper: the complex technical aspects of why intentionally inserting vulnerabilities/weaknesses in encryption is a terrible idea.
Comments advocating for strong "use -it-or-share-it" provisions in the 3.5 GHz Citizens Radio Broadband Service spectrum band to encourage robust unlicensed general authorized access use.
The picture isn't likely to brighten overnight. Although the deal lifts European sanctions against Iran, certain U.S. sanctions will remain for now, according to Danielle Kehl, senior policy analyst at the Washington-based New America Foundation. Meanwhile, some U.S. businesses are actually already selling to Iran thanks to ...
Claims regarding the positive and negative effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on democratic deliberation and development are overblown in both developing and developed countries (Rheingold 2002; Shirky 2008; Noveck 2009; Global Voices 2010; O’Reilly 2010; Morozov 2011; Sifry 2011). The deployment of various ICT projects to enhance governmental accountability, political participation, and public deliberation is at an early stage. It is therefore too early to identify patterns or principles with confidence. Instead, this chapter reviews several efforts to use ICT platforms to improve accountability and democratic engagement and draws lessons about the interaction between technology and politics.